Argent vs. Maestro MCP

Your Maestro flows guard the release. Then a flow goes red, and the report says step 4 failed. Accurate, and not much help.

Maestro MCP lets the agent write those flows, run them and keep them for CI. Argent helps the agent find out why step 4 failed: it drives the app, checks each screen, reads network requests on iOS and profiles the slow parts.

Based on each tool's public documentation, checked October 20, 2026.

Debugging loop or release gate: Argent and Maestro MCP side by side

Both put a coding agent in front of a live iOS simulator or Android emulator. Maestro MCP is built around the test the agent leaves behind. Argent is built around what the agent can find out while the app is still running.

Feature Argent Maestro MCP
Built for
An agent that builds, debugs and profiles the app in one session
An agent that writes and maintains end-to-end UI tests
Platforms
iOS, Android, Apple TV, Android TV, Fire TV, Electron and Chromium apps
iOS, Android and web (Chromium, in beta)
Physical iPhones
Over USB, with a subset of the simulator tools
Not supported yet. iOS simulators only
Physical Android devices
Over adb
Supported
When a step fails
Screenshots and the element tree on demand, plus the native view tree on iOS. In React Native apps, also console logs
No debugging tools. Screen hierarchy and screenshots only
Network requests
Request URLs and status codes on the iOS simulator, no proxy. On Android, JavaScript apps only. Not in Flutter apps yet
Not included
Performance profiling
Xcode Instruments on iOS, with a severity and a suggested fix for each finding. Perfetto on Android, with the UI freezes it found
Not included
Saved test flows
Recorded YAML flows, replayed by the agent or by argent e2e run in CI
Maestro YAML flows, Maestro Studio and the Maestro CLI
Device clouds
BrowserStack, AWS Device Farm, Limrun and TestMu AI, plus Argent Cloud with dedicated iOS simulators
Maestro Cloud with hosted Android, iOS and web devices. Maestro flows also run on BrowserStack (beta)
Sources: docs.swmansion.com/argent, docs.maestro.dev. Checked October 20, 2026.

Tested where e2e frameworks stop

“I've been using argent almost daily since last week. Really simplifies my workflow. I've noticed it's faster than maestro in reading screens and finding things on the screen.”

— torilaure745 on Reddit

Built by Software Mansion

We are Software Mansion: we help our clients build software across mobile, web, and beyond, from native iOS and Android to cross-platform apps, open-source projects, and developer tools.

Read the blog

What the agent can do after a Maestro flow goes red

Step 4 failed

The flow report stops at the tap. With Argent, the agent keeps going: it checks the screen, whether the button sent its request on iOS and what covers the button.

A green flow on a slow screen

Flows check that things happen, not how fast. Argent profiles the slow screen and shows the agent each freeze, and on iOS what caused it.

The bug only shows up on a real iPhone

Maestro doesn't support physical iPhones yet. Argent drives one over USB, signed with a free Apple Personal Team.

Your flows on Argent Cloud, too

Argent Cloud runs the stock Maestro CLI on hosted iOS simulators, even from Linux CI. When a flow fails, the agent can debug it there with Argent.

Questions from Maestro users

No, they do different jobs. Maestro MCP helps an agent write and run Maestro YAML tests. Argent gives the agent the running app. The agent can tap through it, check network traffic on iOS and profile it. If you need a regression suite and a debugging loop, you can run both.

Fix it before the flow goes red

Keep running your Maestro flows while your agent debugs and profiles the app with Argent. When it suits you, record them again in Argent, one at a time.

npx @swmansion/argent init

Features checked October 20, 2026, from argent.swmansion.com, docs.swmansion.com/argent, maestro.dev and docs.maestro.dev. Maestro is a product of mobile.dev Inc. React Native, Swift, SwiftUI, Expo, Android, and Flutter are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Use of these names does not imply endorsement.